Jackson for Plaintiffs and Appellants County of Plumas and Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Craig Settlemire, Gretchen Stuhr, County Counsel Law Office of Roger B. ![]() Moore Shute Mihaly & Weinberger and Ellison Folk for Plaintiff and Appellant County of Butte. Moore, Barton Lounsbury Law Office of Roger B. Stephens, County Counsel Rossmann and Moore, Antonio Rossmann, Roger B. 2 EDITORIAL LISTING APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, Daniel P. Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied. This modification does not change the judgment. On page 16, the second sentence of the first full paragraph, beginning “And while true that DWR did not discuss” is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place: And while true that DWR did not discuss each of these authorities in its EIR, it still conveyed much of the same type of information. 1 THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 7, 2023, be modified as follows: 1. 144282, 144283) were consolidated and transferred from the Butte County Superior Court to the Yolo County Superior Court (No. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, Defendant and Respondent STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT COUNTY OF PLUMAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING Defendant and Respondent STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) -COUNTY OF BUTTE, C071785 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |